BEYOND THE BLOG

SPIRITUALISM

Posted by anthonynorth on January 31, 2007

beta-obe.jpgFlorence Cook used to attract large audiences in 19th century America. She was a Spiritualist medium who, as well as offering evidence of dead people, also had a spirit guide called Katie King who would take over her body.
Equally fascinating was Helen Duncan who died in 1956. This Scottish woman became famous during World War Two and was even prosecuted for her work. At one point she gave out information about a sunken warship during a seance. It was still a secret.
Spiritualism is a form of mediumship which first appeared in the 1840s following the antics of the Fox Sisters, who claimed to contact a dead pedlar through a series of knockings. Publicity from the case caused an explosion of such mediumship.
Soon, people throughout Europe and America began to gather in front rooms for a séance, where attempts were made to contact the dead. A medium would go into a trance whilst people held hands around a table. A spirit guide would then take over the person and communicate with the dead.
In its heyday, physical manifestations were said to break out, including spirit hands, table tilting and the appearance of ectoplasm. However, as methods of recording such phenomena appeared, the ability declined, suggesting fraud was involved.
Typical of this was Eusapia Palladino. Researcher Hereward Carrington became convinced she was genuine, offering strong evidence of mediumship and table tilting. But at other times, she was a clumsy fraudster, easily caught out.
At one stage, researchers looked at Spiritualism in the hope of finding proof of life after death, but fraud and delusion led to disappointment. Today, Spiritualist churches have cleaned up much of this fraud, but evidence is still illusive.
Mediums are often said to use ‘cold reading’, where the questions they ask provide hints as to what the client wants to hear. Others, such as 1940s medium William Roy, used apparatus from telescopic rods to fake levitation, to hidden microphones in the anteroom. Even where genuine phenomena is said to exist, telepathy between medium and client could be the cause.
Many mediums seem to have a traumatic childhood and turn in on themselves. This could suggest that their spirit guides could be related to multiple personality, where the mind can fragment into other characters who take over the host. Medium Eileen Garrett admitted she wasn’t sure that her spirit guides were who they claimed to be. Such a phenomenon could also explain why sometimes they appear genuine, and at other times cheat.
Is there an alternative location for the spirit guide other than from the afterlife? Split-brain research could offer explanation. The brain is made up of the left and right cerebral hemispheres, the left dealing with reason and the right being more the artist. At times they seem to work separately, and it has been suggested that the right brain can give the impression that emotional thoughts are coming from elsewhere.
Mediumship is, infact, very ancient. In tribal societies a ‘shaman’ would commune with animal spirits to cleanse the tribe. Similar ‘spirit guides’ are used to this day, whilst other mediums have become ‘channellers’, said to be contacting discarnate entities. However, no medium was more famous that Daniel Dunglas Home.
During the 1840s he was famous throughout America and Europe for his small seances where he levitated people, large objects and himself. Witnesses often spoke of the fleetingness of what they had seen. Indeed, the phenomenon is similar to stage hypnosis, where people can think such phenomena occurs. Does this suggest cheating, or maybe the mediums had no idea they were natural hypnotisers.

© Anthony North, November 2006

6 Responses to “SPIRITUALISM”

  1. leothemedium Says:

    Dear Sir,
    I think you need to redo your research? Absolute proof of life after death has been available for over 100 years in the UK. You should also investigate the mediumship of Mr Leslie flint at http://www.leslieflint.com who, during his time was the most tested medium ever and has produced many thousands of voice recordings sometimes lasting over an hour with “spirits” who are obviously extremely intelligent and answer questions and hypothesize on all manner of subjects including medicine, sub atomic physics! On the subject of which you will need to look at Mr Ronald Pearson a Sub Atomic physicist who has proved again beyond doubt that with mathematics this other dimension does exist. You like many may ask why then is this information not available, not published? It is, however, it is subject to persecution, control, and censorship. Why? Because the truth as such is unpalatable to those who govern either in politics or religion for the simple fact that “the truth shall let you free” and where would governments and religions be with truly free people? Nowhere and that is the truth.

    If you doubt any of this without properly investigating then you are standing with those who damn it for selfish reasons or blindness. Even Steven Hawking a strong atheist has admitted to there being at least 11 dimensions to investigate. Nearly 90% of the human brain is unknown to science and the greatest ever-living genius Leonardo DaVinci was estimated to use less than 10% of his brain. One last thing to think about. If this is “unproven,” why are the American and Russian governments STILL spending very many millions of dollars on this subject every single year in the form of tests onboard Nasa spacecraft, remote viewing, astral projection and the like if it was wasting money with no result?

  2. AnthonyNorth Says:

    Hi Leothemedium,
    If you bothered to research me thoroughly enough, you’d find out this is an opening statement on the subject. You seem to suffer from the same lacking you place on me.

  3. leothemedium Says:

    No, I think not. There is a lot of scepticism there. Hidden as usual by raising points that seem to go with the opposite train of thought. Nothing ever changes! If you genuinely believed in what you are saying, why do you try to hide it in opening statements? It is a typical sceptic trick, false and misleading. I always think that honesty is the best policy.

    The point is only one of us is right and there is only one way of really finding out, from your point of view. Sceptics seem to enjoy laughing at this and forever pointing out “it could be this” rather than “it may be that.”

    Point being, he who laughs last laughs longest. Sceptics should enjoy their laugh now (as they do)for they believe they have it last. However, eternity is a long time for regrets. Also, Spiritualism is not a form of Mediumship! Where on earth did you get that from?

  4. anthonynorth Says:

    Hi Leo,
    I don’t know why I’m wasting my time here as you’ve obviously not taken my advice. I’ve been researching the paranormal for over 20 years, and one thing that strikes me is that scepticism is perfectly balanced with the same intransigence by some psychics.
    You say: ‘I always think that honesty is the best policy.’ So be honest. Are you saying I’m lying? You further say: ‘The point is only one of us is right …’ Well, good on you for open mindedness. As for: ‘Spiritualism is not a form of Mediumship’? What planet are you on?
    Once you remove the fraudsters - of which there are many - there is still a phenomenon to be understood. Something is happening. I accept that. But I do not accept classical explanation. Rather, I look at the nature of knowledge, look what is known today, and try to nudge it forwards. Where that will eventually lead, I have no idea. But I do know that you and sceptics alike need to realise this instead of taking ridiculously fanatical stances that do no good at all.
    Not that I think you will take the slightest notice of what I say. Those who are their own worse enemies are like that.

  5. leothemedium Says:

    Spiritualism is a recognised religion. That has nothing to do with the fact of being a medium. Mediumship is not a religion! They can and do act independently. It seems that if you cannot get the basics correct then no wonder you feel there are frauds round every corner. As for what you say after that I can only say ditto. It also applies that those who are in danger of losing an argument begin to use animosity within arguments. You have very easily given away your character and I leave you to judge yourself on that.

    There is nothing more to say and I will not be drawn by narrow mindedness especially by those who close their minds when looking at so-called “evidence” good day. Bless you.

  6. anthonynorth Says:

    And goodbye to you, Leo. Run, run away from the discussion, like so many who are caught on the hoof, and are intransigent, leaving silly insult in your wake :-)

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>