BEYOND THE BLOG

ABOLISH POLITICAL PARTIES

Posted by anthonynorth on March 23, 2007

houses-of-parliament.jpgBritish politics has been in a mess for some time. Prior to Thatcherism, the two main parties came into power and went again as if on a political see-saw. No time was allowed for proper policies to formulate, and as soon as sanity seemed to prevail, the new party took over and threw away all the previous party had done.
With Thatcherism, all that changed. A long period of stability in Parliament followed, which was itself followed by a long period of New Labour. This was the opposite of see-saw politics, but the result was equally as bad. Both parties soon settled down into a form of elective dictatorship.
One answer to the problem of British politics is proportional representation. This is a very bad idea. Central to accountability is the idea that a constituency picks the MP it wants. PR would have MPs imposed on a constituency. They would be pure party animals, and the voter immaterial.
We need a new look at British politics. We need to begin a …

CAMPAIGN FOR THE ABOLITION OF POLITICAL PARTIES

Political parties are at the core of the problem. There is nothing in the British constitution to say we need them. So maybe the answer is to discard them. We need to do this for many reasons other than an attempt to bring stability to the British Parliament.

POLITICS & CONSCIENCE

We think we vote for an MP to use his judgment in formulating legislation. This is not the case with party politics. Rather, party whips brow beat and bully MPs to follow the party line. Go against the party line and there is no chance of succeeding in the party. This is totally immoral and contrary to conscience.

LOCAL PARTY DICTATORSHIP

An MP is supposed to be a representative of a constituency. He is not there to do as he is told, but to think for himself. If you don’t like what he does, he can be voted out or removed by the constituency party. Nowadays, constituency parties are bullied by the national party into taking candidates the Party wants. You do not get the MP you deserve and he is unlikely to have his constituent’s best interests at heart.

THE CAREER POLITICIAN

The vast majority of MPs today are party animals. They are not inspired by personal political views as much as hoping for a long and successful political career. They are often groomed by the party from an early age, and have little understanding of real life. Politics, as a career, is the worst reason for going into politics.

MANAGERS, NOT STATESMEN

Because of the ideological constraints of party politics, MPs today believe that all the major questions have been answered. This is complacency of the first order, made worse by a refusal to rock the boat. MPs are no longer politicians, but managers, unable to see a different political future.

POLITICS & MEDIA

Political parties can draw on a massive financial power base. The result of this is that they can spend their views into the main media. In order to maintain their grip on power, or to attempt to be in power next time, political concepts are simplified to the soundbite and any contrary views are marginalised or watered down to the point that they are inefficient to tackle the problems we face.

DEBATE? WHAT DEBATE?

Because of the above factors, debate in Parliament is now lame. Issues are not correctly thrashed out and we do not get to the answers we need. The situation is now so bad that there is talk of a non-adversarial Parliament. This is nothing less than an attempt by the political parties to form an absolute monopoly on ideas. The result would be a One Ideology State, and democracy would slowly disappear.

SORTING OUT THE PROBLEM

A campaign should begin to, first, point out the above problems, and second, popularise an easy solution to the problem. This solution is based around a new form of Parliamentarian - a form that once existed in Britain but is hated by every political party.

THE INDEPENDENT MP

Local campaigns should begin to finance and elect local personalities totally divorced from political parties. We should resurrect the Independent MP. Further, fund raising should be inaugurated to attempt to elect MPs who represent minority and marginalised interests. A voluntary organisation should be set up, free of political persuasion, to offer grants to such independent candidates to fight for Parliament.

COMMONSENSE

Of course, the political parties will not, and should not, disappear. Without political parties it would be difficult to actually run a government, so a political party would need to be voted into power. But if a sizeable proportion of MPs were independent, no political party would be able to have a monopoly on power.

RETURN OF THE DEBATE

With independent MPs in Parliament, debate would again become vocal, the MPs untethered by party whips. The party line would be smashed, and Parliament would again get to the bottom of the major issues. Personalities would also rise of interest to the electorate, and people would again become interested in politics.

THE SENSIBLE VOTE

Whilst debate would again become adversarial, and at times extreme and fanatical, this is unlikely to be reflected in the Parliamentary vote. Rather, for the ruling party to get law through Parliament, they would have to moderate legislation in order to win the support of enough independent MPs to guarantee success. The legislation that is passed is more likely to be sensible and well thought through.

THE SILENT REVOLUTION

Traditional political change tends to come through revolution. The end result is a government that is often fanatical. Fanatics take centre stage and the repercussions for society are dire. The move towards independent MPs must not be considered a revolution, but a transition.

SUBTLE POLITICS

The secret of good politics is the use of subtlety. Revolutions cause change quickly and often violently. The way forward is to use public opinion to change the top from the bottom up. The internet is perfect for this through the use of viral marketing. All you have to do is link to this campaign statement and pass it on. There is no need for rallies, no need for heated exchange, no need for any of the usual political devices. Let public opinion rise and slowly, very slowly and peacefully, a new political dawn will arise.

© Anthony North, November 2006

21 Responses to “ABOLISH POLITICAL PARTIES”

  1. jeanspierre Says:

    dear all,
    i go along with you in sweeping away all the political parties.
    Here in Italy the “left side” is equal to the “right side”. They eat everything and nobody here is feeling that he has been represented. Why do not use the French Revolution’s election. That was the only form of democracy, I mean pure democracy 100%

  2. anthonynorth Says:

    Hi Jeanspierre,
    I couldn’t disagree with you more. I’m talking about curtailing political parties, not getting rid of representative government. Direct democracy is the road to tyranny and totalitarianism.
    If this is the option, I’d rather keep the parties. It is the lesser evil.

  3. ronny Says:

    I suppose politcal parties must be allowed somehow as a free speech issue, but the trading of votes, and voting for political expediancy is a form of fraud. Here in America the same black practices you have describe exist. The citizen representative should be king, and people in government must not be allowed to consort along philosophical or ideological affiliations, because that is conspiracy against the people.

  4. anthonynorth Says:

    Hi Ronny,
    Absolutely. I couldn’t agree with you more.

  5. Ntharotep Says:

    I’m not sure how getting rid of representitive government would lead to tyranny…IF we were a total democracy as in litterally voting every issue.

    I think the representitive part comes in by the fact that the logistics of every individual voting on every issue is just nearly impossible. It would require daily voting at least. Imagine a society where you have to rush home and vote on issues before dinner time…every night?

    I think we should vote on the presidency and the representitives but that they should be based on individual merits. I do, indeed, think that political parties have served their purpose and have outlived their usefulness (much like Unions). The party lines are blurring so much now that it is really just wasted money (individual money and government funds) to continue supporting them. And so much effort seems to be wasted on tearing the “opposing party” down (or even the opposing candidate in your own party) that the real issues in our country have gone ignored (such as being forced to choose between gasoline and food, retirement becomming an extinct animal, choosing between food and medicine, etc).

    It saddens me a little how low we have fallen and how far we have come from things that made this a great country. We’ve traded it all for media hyperbole.

  6. anthonynorth Says:

    Hi Ntharotep,
    Welcome. Yes, political parties are now failing us badly, stifling real debate and becoming a ‘managerial’ class rather than politicians. But it should be representative government through independents.
    The reason why direct democracy would be tyranny is answered, in a way, by your last sentence. For ‘media hyperbole’ would influence so many how to vote on a daily basis. Niceties such as ‘minorities’ would be disenfranchised as a whim.
    In the UK, consider bringing back hanging. The polls always have a majority. Representative government, in free vote, never does. People who press buttons do not necessarily think the issues through. Representatives do.

  7. ronny Says:

    These days, America is embroiled in an “election”. I find that sometimes I actually get caught up in the facade, and almost believe that the candidates believe what they are saying. But I must jolt myself back to reality, with the reminder that all of these “candidates” are already bought and sold by their keepers. Obama is handsome and soothing, and Hillary is inspiring to those who feel they lack representation, and Huckabee is that down-home Christian giving hope to the fabrications of those who “believe”. They are all practicing to be that polished mirror that reflects only what people wish to see. They are not truly saying what they believe in meditative conscience — they are saying what they have learned people want to hear — for the ends of acquiring power and all it brings. Such is the pity.

  8. anthonynorth Says:

    Hi Ronny,
    For as long as you have politicians with a ‘career plan’ in a party, you’ll have this. It is time for a new breed of politician, fuelled by cause, and not simply power.

  9. iangarvie Says:

    The biggest problem with political parties, is that they have forgotten that they are the servants of the public, not the masters. They continually act agains the best interests of the nations.

    I get the gut feeling that if more independants were put up for election, there would be changes made to the system to eliminate them….not physically, although….maybe that to :-)

  10. anthonynorth Says:

    Hi Ian,
    At which point, it would be up to the electorate to make sure they didn’t.
    Democracy is based on John Locke’s separation of powers and inalienable rights. Our political class has allowed us to forget that one of those rights is to rebel against bad government.

  11. Ian Garvie Says:

    Damned right, you could not be more right. Today if you protest you are seen as a dissident. you get a group of like minded people together to demonstrate, and immediately you have the riot police out. What happend to the right to peacful demonstrations? now adays it seem you are intim idated before you start.

    I’ve noticed this sinister change since the early sixties . It used to be that you went on a demonstreation, and you actually could talk reasonably with the police who were there minding the demonstrators, now, you get intimidation, and police cameras recording everything. This all adds up to one pretty sick and frightened society

  12. anthonynorth Says:

    Hi Ian,
    It is worrying indeed. If you’re interested, I have a number of short essays on my own analysis of what’s going on. You can access them by clicking FREEDOM and SUPER-CAPITALISM categories on my right sidebar.

  13. Rinky Stingpiece Says:

    To be practical, the best realistic solution is proportional representation.
    It’s not perfect, but it’s a start.
    More to the point, it’s realistically achievable.
    I mean, we can all wax lyrical about how we’d change the world, but we’re wasting our time if we are not also focussing our energy on achievable objectives.

    We know that the voter turnout has dropped like a stone since IngSoc came to power, and is set to fall again to about 50%
    http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Images/elections%202_tcm6-6963.jpg

    Here’s an interesting bit of evidence:
    Countries without compulsory voting with turnout higher than the UK:
    Malta - PR
    Italy - PR
    Iceland - PR
    Denmark - PR
    Germany - PR
    Sweden - PR
    Czechland - PR
    Costa Rica - PR
    Netherlands -PR
    Romania -PR
    Bulgaria - PR
    Israel - PR
    Canada
    France
    Finland - PR
    Portugal - PR
    Norway - PR
    http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/4/44/Turnout.png
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_voting#Now

    So what are they doing right? Clearly it’s PR.

    What about those without PR?

    Canada, but let’s be honest, their turnout is comparable to the UK’s.
    http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/report/govrev/04/images/cp-rc24_e.gif

    In France, it was until Sarkozy arrived…
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6582007.stm

    So we have two solutions: a visionary right-wing leader, who will eventually be shown to be flawed; or the statistically reliable solution of PR.

    Sure, a revolution may be possible as the UK approaches crisis of energy and ethnic strife over the next twenty years; but the safe option is to campaign for PR.

  14. anthonynorth Says:

    Hi Rinky,
    The answer is to attempt to return to a more British kind of government, as it used to be pre-NuLabour, ideally with independents to take away the possibility of a party doing this again.
    Proportional representation?
    No! No! No!

  15. Rinky Stingpiece Says:

    I agree with returning to more British kind of government - a ruling druid-priest class as in pre-Roman times would be far superior to the rubbish we have to endure now.

    You are being naive.

    A fundamental human behaviour in evolutionary psychology is the group-forming behaviour.

    You suppose, optimistically, that independents will not form groups of common interest and work as a team to support each other’s similar goals.

    You may be able to remove the superficial appearance of political parties; but the behaviour is hard-wired into our brain.

    I recognise that PR leads to a tendency to make deals behind closed doors; but it also will lead to a greater voice for parties like UKIP and the BNP, which can only be welcomed.

    PR is our best hope of escaping the tentacles of the Euro-beast.

    Personally my ideal form is microdevolution, like a Swiss-Canton model, with each county council like a confederal micro-government, able to set its own taxes, laws, and have it’s own immigration and residency rules. Places like Cornwall, Highland, and Cubmria particularly need to get rid off all the middle-class middle-aged colonialists depriving young local families of a home in their own land.
    If every county was a crown dependency like Jersey and the Isle of Man, that would be truly wonderful… we would still have the same Royal Navy, RAF, and Army, but centralised government could be limited to a senate of “county mayors”.
    It’s clear that the centralisation of power disenfranchises people from the process; microdevolution is the only solution!

  16. anthonynorth Says:

    Hi Rinky,
    As I’ve asked on your last comment on another thread, can you please make your comments much, much shorter. I don’t have the time for such long posts.
    Of course independents would eventually form like-minded groups. And when that happens, it would be time for another infusion of further independents, ad infinitum.
    The answer is not revolution, but a process of continually moderating the system.

  17. ronny Says:

    Why does the answer have to be such a psycho-social upheaval or complex political movement? Can’t political parties be curbed by simply forbidding government from accomodating them in any way? Let people have their assinine associations, but create a barrier between the parties and the workings of government — much like the separation of church and state is supposed to operate.

  18. anthonynorth Says:

    Hi Ronny,
    Thanks for the comment. The first problem with your idea is that the legislators, who ARE the parties, would never agree to it. They’d be committing suicide.
    But the main problem is the fundamentals of democracy. It operates on common law, in that law applies equally to all, without exception.
    Hence, you cannot ban politicians from association. You’d have to stop ALL association. And once that’s done, all the other inalienable rights are up for grabs. Right to free speech, to religion, to rebel against unjust law. It would risk the lot.

  19. ronny Says:

    Please reread my post: I said let people have their associations, but keep them outside the operations of government. It is the accomodation of the government and usurpation by the parties that is at issue here.

  20. anthonynorth Says:

    Hi Ronny,
    Please reread my comment. Common law demands all are equal before the law. You cannot ban association of any kind for an MP without doing it for all.
    Further, political parties are not constitutionally a government. It just so happens that a PM usually picks Cabinet members from his party. Parties are separate to government.

  21. mike leonardi Says:

    Check out my website, getridofbothparties.com. We need to have all elections non partisan, open up eletions to get real leaders and the brightest. Too long a list of silver spoon in mouth leaders get elected because who their relatives are or how much $$ they have to buy election!!!

    Mike Leonardi
    Aurora, IL

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>