HOW TO EXPLAIN MIDDLECLASS
Posted by anthonynorth on May 31, 2008
Featuring Writers’ Island. Have you had a go yet?
Back in the Middle Ages the class structure was simple and straight forward. There was the king and his aristocracy, and there were the serfs, with a fledgling middleclass in between in the form of monk (who offered assistance to the poor) or knight.
During the Renaissance, this middleclass moved into two main areas – enterprise and the intellect. Cities suddenly became predominantly merchant centres richer than the monarch, and the universities powered the new philosophies of the Enlightenment.
The middleclass was on the rise.
And what followed was the most successful revolution in history. Central to its success was the removal of power and wealth from the aristocracy. In some countries, such as France, it was a bloody affair, whilst in Britain, it was much more subtle.
First of all, non-Conformist denominations arose such as the Methodists, removing power from the established Church. Second, philanthropists and philosophers worked towards institutionalized assistance for the poor.
This second point acclimatized the poor.
This was for the institutionalization of the factory, which was soon to follow, kick-starting the Industrial Revolution, and giving the middleclass the economic power base to finally de-stabilize the aristocracy.
Once this was achieved, the revolution was completed by the institution of the middleclass jury to oust the judicial power of the aristocracy, and the growing influence of ‘commoner’ Parliamentarians, finally grasping control of the sovereign power of the State.
This darker side to the story is not often told.
But the reality is, ‘middleclass’ was a revolution aimed at moving power from the aristocracy down to the next class level. And essential to the process was the idea of the ‘individual’.
In this new revolution, anyone could grasp the individuality to better himself. And to allow it to happen, the power of tradition had to be smashed. Now, I tell this story how it is for an important reason. Because the revolution never stopped.
We live, today, in its latest manifestation.
Middleclass intellectualism went on to complete the job of smashing tradition with the rise of political correctness. And whilst the initial phase concerned philanthropists, this second stage brought about freedoms for minorities, but this does not discount the initial urge to power involved in the process.
Political correctness worked hand in hand with a new resurgence of entrepreneurialism, in that it began an assault on the remaining traditions in family and State. This removed ‘meaning’ from people’s lives, which was then provided by the entrepreneur in mass consumerism.
With allegiance to the State in decline, and mass consumerism providing a new economic power to enterprise, the multi-national corporation grew to overshadow the political State, actually funding the politicians of their choosing.
And so we arrive at today. The middleclass has expanded to include most of an advanced population. Yet in doing so, they have automatically become the subservient class to those middleclass individuals who rose high in the corporate world.
Offered supposed wealth and freedoms, this new middleclass has now become the new serf, to the new ‘aristocracy’ of the 1% mega rich. Thus, the revolution is complete, and we have arrived back where we began.
After all, that is what ‘revolution’ really means.
© Anthony North, May 2008
stan said
What goes round… Classless society indeed. Upper, middle and lower has become ‘have’s’, ‘have not’s’ and ‘wil never have’s’.
When does the next cycle start?
anthonynorth said
Hi Stan,
Shortly after we’ve had enough of this lot, and some people tell us they can do it better.
Unless, of course, we finally learn. But that’s just me being a naive fool.
Simonne said
Great post, especially the last line. And I see what you mean now about the writer’s prompts – a great idea
anthonynorth said
Hi Simonne,
Many thanks. So … are you going to have a go?
keith hillman said
The classes rely on each other for their existance. Each one needs the others and it always will be so. I fear a classless society simply wouldn’t – couldn’t work.Interesting piece
- please sir, may I have some more? Nancy indeed!!! Come on Scala!!!
eyelean said
I’m in sinc with this short and sweet post. I really like the last line too and agree with Keith, no matter what we want to think and believe, we’re interdependent. eye
Robin said
Those last few sentences really sum it all up, don’t they?
goesdownbitter said
As the pie has gotten bigger, the percentages to all economic classes has rarely changed. The latest figure I saw was that worldwide the top 10% in terms of wealth, owned 80% of all assets. The rulers never went away, they simply changed their costumes.
anthonynorth said
Hi Keith,
I agree. People are different. Classes are different. Some will always have the urge towards power. We’re stuck with it. We DO need this interconnection. We can change the culture – gain a respite, maybe – but it will forever go back to the beginning.
Jodie won, by the way
Hi Eyelean,
Thanks for that. And ‘ditto’
Hi Robin,
I think they do. We have this idea that we advance, whereas we really go round in circles.
Hi Goesdownbitter,
Absolutely. No matter what system – Christendom, Fascism, Capitalism, Communism – it’s always the same political and social reality. It’s only the ’story’ that changes.
dmarks said
stan: or haves vs have mores. The people who moan about inequality because they have only two cars and someone else has 10 cars. The jealousy the well-off have for the very-well-off. Seems very pointless. They get in a twist about that, instead of getting in a twist about those who are “have nots”.
Gemma said
What a great overview of where we have been and how cleverly we have managed to simply go backwards! (Or is it actually we are still on the same spot?)
Gemma
anthonynorth said
Hi Dmarks,
I think to consider the point in terms of ‘cars’ and jealousy rather undermines the point being made.
Hi Gemma,
Thanks for that. Sadly, it is always thus. A strange thing, this illusion called social advancement.
dmarks said
Ok. sorry
anthonynorth said
Hi Dmarks,
Aw, you’re making me feel guilty now
totaltransformation said
“Yet in doing so, they have automatically become the subservient class to those middleclass individuals who rose high in the corporate world.”
I knew I should have stayed a business major and landed a corporate job. Instead I languish as a grad student in academia who will probably have to beg, borrow, and steal to find a good job after I graduate.
anthonynorth said
Hi TT,
Welcome to serfdom
Rambler said
middle class to me has always been the intermediate class of richness, not rich enough to afford luxury, and not poor enough to forget about it.
nice to read this, I did go and search wikipedia for more information on this.
thanks for sharing
whypaisley said
all of this i believe walks hand in hand with a discussion you presented not long ago on the real effects that “womens liberation” has had on the family,, the economy and the necessity to have two full time incomes to survive.. i cannot remember the name of the article,, but i am sure you can and will know what i am talking about…..
Selma said
Excellent summation but why do I find it so depressing? Maybe I just don’t know my place well enough. It would be nice to think, wouldn’t it, that we’ve moved on a bit regarding class and all its limitations? But we haven’t. Maybe in another five hundred years.
Constance said
Round and round we go, when we stop, nobody knows. Which is why I prefer living in my own little world.
Otherwise, I’d feel mighty helpless…
anthonynorth said
Hi Rambler,
Thanks for that. You offer a good definition of middle class there.
Hi Paisley,
Yes, I’ve written about that many times. My argument is, regardless of what good there was in political correctness, it was only allowed free reign because Bi Biz realised it destroyed tradition and meaning in family and State, allowing global consumerism to become predominant.
Now totally unbridled, it is becoming a form of dictat, literally assisting in bringing back a form of totalitarianism.
Hi Selma,
Yes, it is depressing. But maybe liberation can come in finally understanding the process. At least, I live in hope.
Hi Constance,
Yes, I live in my own little world a lot, too. This blog is the result. A strange world I live in
Comedy Plus said
Makes sense to me. Full circle it is. Have a great day Anthony.
anthonynorth said
Hi Sandee,
Indeed. We go spinning round through history thinking we’re advancing, when we’re only getting dizzy
dmarks said
np. i will just go back to the rest of my blog list.
SweetTalkingGuy said
Phew! You really tell it like it is!
texasblu said
Oh yeah – I totally get this. I’m so surprised when people don’t make the connection between middle class and slavery. Well said Anthony. There is a book called “The Fourth Turning” that talks about cycles of society – thought you might be interested. That is, if you haven’t already read it.
anthonynorth said
Hi SweetTalkingGuy,
I do try
Hi Texasblu,
Thanks for that. No, I haven’t read it. I’ll have to look it up. Sounds interesting.
Carol_Noble said
Like the premise Anthony, and I agree with most of it. I also appreciate the thought about the meaning of “revolution”. Thanks for your thoughts.
anthonynorth said
Hi Carol,
Thanks for that. With my meaning of ‘revolution’, we’re told we live in a linear world where we advance. Personally, I think we’re still stuck in a ‘cyclic’ world. It’s only cultures that change, giving the impression of advancement.
Linda G said
Hi Anthony,
Thanks for the link to this article- it is so timely.
Re: ‘With allegiance to the State in decline, and mass consumerism providing a new economic power to enterprise, the multi-national corporation grew to overshadow the political State, actually funding the politicians of their choosing.’
If I remember correctly, consumerism represents 70% of US GDP- frightening! I’m betting the biggest part of the remaining chunk is financial services.
And our consumerism has global consequences- or rather the drastic reduction in this consumerism. Japan has seen it’s exports decline 50% & it’s an export nation (to us mainly).
Slowly, truths are beginning to bubble up to the surface & the middle class is quite angry. The poorer class was already angry. If this anger can be constructively deployed, maybe there is a chance- the ‘have alots’ are quite a small minority.
We need a ‘economic change’ Ghandi/ML King to help organize a movement for change. I do so want this to be possible- yet the pessimist that lurks in me says it is impossible. Nothing should be impossible if the change is needed badly enough.
anthonynorth said
Hi Linda,
It would certainly be difficult – no disputing that. I suppose the first stage is to get the message out there – what is being done behind this image of affluence.