HOW TO EXPLAIN ENTITIES
Posted by anthonynorth on July 20, 2008
An entity is something that has separate existence, but not necessarily in a material sense. As such, it can be a concept. But in regard to the paranormal, the term is traditionally used to identify a ghost, demon, etc.
Entities, of various forms, have appeared throughout human history. I’m not interested, here, in how they appear, but why? Do they have a specific purpose, or are they simply silly distractions of the fantasy-prone?
Entities are not cast in stone.
Rather, they change over time. Indeed, I’ve used the term ‘psychic waves’ to explain this mode of change over the centuries. And several theorists are fundamental to putting together the pieces of a possible reason why.
Take mythologist Joseph Campbell. He identified universal similarities in myths. I’ve used the term ‘universal psychology’ to identify this form of identical thinking that lies behind the phenomenon. Carl Jung also offered the collective unconscious, where ‘archetypes’ appear in myth and dream, also suggesting universality.
This suggests a standard pattern in our mind-set.
So could this suggest a standard pattern to entities, which are seen through the mind, are they not? Other researchers, such as Jacques Vallee, offer a possible reason for all this.
They speak of a ‘psychic menagerie’ lying below our conscious thought, acting as if a ‘control mechanism’ upon our culture, aspirations, etc. So is it possible that such a mechanism exists? And if so, why? Maybe a short natural history of the entity would be useful.
The first possibly known entities were animal spirits.
Fundamental to the first nature religions, the shaman would communicate with them in order to form a contract between man and nature.
This was important because nature was the central arena of man’s endeavour. As man began to move out of nature, he expressed ‘ego’, and entities changed into the ‘chimera’ – half animal, half man. The agricultural revolution then led to the city, and our new entities were the gods and superheroes of Classical myth.
Monotheism brought a change in entities.
Banishing the previous paganism, entities expressed ‘evil’, and were thus seem as demons, or more subtle fairies. Man was pure, so when he did evil himself, it couldn’t be him. Hence, much evil action came to be seen in terms of the werewolf.
As the Medieval world began to collapse and man gained predominance, entities became man-based, in the vampire. As we moved away from a spiritual world due to the Enlightenment, entities began to remind us of the spiritual in the ghost and, as the Englightenment crashed into 19th and 20th century conflicts, the spirit guide and communication with the dead.
Next, we began to look at the possibility of space travel, and the entity became the UFO and alien. And today, as spirituality becomes personal in the New Age, the entity has become the guardian angel.
Of course, various entities have always been seen, but there is a distinct pattern to predominant entities throughout history. And in every case they come in line with specific changes in man’s attitudes. It is as if they are born from our changing mind-set and the cultural expressions that arise – a kind of psychic media-form.
Of course, we must then face the possibility that, as with main media, an idea arises and is then symbolically represented in media, thus defining it and changing society in kind. And if we place this function upon entities, then the paranormal becomes the actual engine of historical change. In effect, it expresses a concept – which is, of course, the intellectual meaning of the word, entity.
© Anthony North, July 2008
SandyCarlson said
Your article made me think of Newgrange….
anthonynorth said
Hi Sandy,
Yes, some strange and influential things have gone on there in the past.
Just Jen said
my eldest is completely into werewolves right now…his youtube page is filled with movies on werewolves…lol
thanks for your encouraging comment…I needed that!!
anthonynorth said
Hi Just Jen,
You’re very welcome. By the way, I’m planning a post on Werewolves in the future. May be a month or two, but watch out for it. This, too, may not be quite what it seems.
Twilight said
You’ve given us quite a lot to chew on there, AN! I’d not thought about entities having a time-line before, but, yes, I can see it’s quite logical.
Do you have a theory as to why only some people claim to see or experience entities, while others (like me) only read of them ?
Selma said
How incredibly interesting. I had not thought of the distinct pattern of the predominant entity throughout the ages before, but now that you point it out…..
that’s why I love coming here!
anthonynorth said
Hi Twilight,
I haven’t written anything specific lately on who experiences entities, but I have on being ‘psychic’ in general, which would apply equally here.
How To Be Psychic
As I say, most kinds of entities exist at most times, but degrees of popularity do seem to come in specific periods. Some entities also change cultural clothes. Consider a person being surrounded by a light, floated into a strange room, examined, and replaced by a hybrid child.
Alien abduction? Or fairy changeling.
Hi Selma,
Thanks for that. You can even mark out particular periods within a particular entity. Ufologists call is ‘cultural tracking’ and can chart the changes in ‘aliens’ since the 1940s, based on the predominant media image of what they should look like.
Susan Helene Gottfried said
Interesting, Anthony. I just finished reading a really great paranormal, so I’ve got all that roaming around my head as I’m reading this and man, it makes perfect sense.
anthonynorth said
Hi Susan,
Thanks for that. One thing I’ve realised over the years studying such subjects is that they fit a system. It’s a fascinating subject, nonetheless.
Comedy Plus said
Another Joseph Campbell fan. I too liked his work. My husband watches his tapes over and over. He was indeed brilliant. Have a great day Anthony.
john ryan said
Hi Anthony- Once again, much food for thought. If I remember correctly, Julian Jaynes touched upon this topic in his classic The Origin of Consciousness and the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. As man evolves, so does his thought processes. We no longer consider the succubus or incubus, but today classify these as ‘demons’, perhaps a result of Enlightenment thinking. There is an interesting connection between the Civil War here in the States and the rise of the Spiritualist movement that soon followed. I tend to agree with Jung (I need to re-read him; it’s been years)– there does seem to be a collective consciousness: we seem to have the ability to discern whether a ’symbol’ has religious significance even without knowledge of the particular belief system it pertains to. It’s that fine line between religion and mysticism. I’m rambling…
I’ve been gone for a while; it’s good to be back! I hope all is well!
acriticalchristian1971 said
Its curious to see how many ‘entities’ are actually man made thru imagination… Or thru ‘other’ variables…
anthonynorth said
Good morning Sandee,
Yes, he was certainly a bright guy. Seminal to my own research.
Hi John,
Good to hear from you again. I’ve used Jaynes’s work myself, in terms of changes of consciousness. He’s another interesting guy.
Your mention of the Civil War is apt. This was the first modern war of attrition, where industry allowed a continual supply of manpower and ammunition. For the first time, winning on the battlefield was not enough. The opposing society had to be overcome.
This led to a need for a new kind of religion, divorced from the traditional, and able to provide answers as to so many dead. Spiritualism fitted the bill perfectly, truly finding its niche in World War One.
There’s also another social link to it. Spiritualism was principally a ’sitting room’ religion, and mainly involving a new role for women. It is no coincidence that the seminal moment in Spiritualism (the Fox Sisters) and the seminal moment in Feminism (the Seneca Falls Convention) both occurred in New York State in 1848.
Hi Acriticalchristian,
I don’t recall saying that. I suspect you’re putting your own values on my words.
artpredator said
fascinating tromp through time via this perspective, Tony! it all makes sense the way you frame it so clearly and simply without oversimplifying!
anthonynorth said
Hi Artpredator,
Thanks for that. Yes, it isn’t often appreciated that such entities are so closely associated with both culture and history. One is a consequence of the other. Deciding which CAUSES the other is a fascinating subject.
Ann said
Far too broad anything, then, can be an “entity” – my next door neighbor, for instance.
anthonynorth said
Hi Ann,
Not really. Is your neighbour non-corporeal? If you don’t really know your neighbour and have a subjective idea about her, then that could be an entity. But I suspect if you prick them and they bleed, they’re pretty much human.
Chris said
Hi Anthony,
Another one that I’m unsure where to post because it covers a few areas so I’ll try here (I’m still learning!).
I really like your concept of time-lines for entities as it ties in nicely with other of your ideas such as consensus realities and the impact that the perception/’observation’ of the human race has on perceived ‘reality’.
The guardian angel also ties in beautifully with your poem, ‘The Angel’.
After I read it a couple of extra lines ‘popped’ into my head which may partially fit with this “Entities” post;
“Angel out there can’t you see?
……….
………. (I’m not sure if I’m allowed to do that or not? but I have
to help you, guide you,
stop you being a fool”
‘For don’t you see?
The Angel is really in thee and me.’
I think that the ‘angel’ may exist in all of us, the ‘hard’ part is letting the beauty out, by-passing materialism, prejudices, peer group expectation and the associated fear of rejection.
I wonder if “predominant entities” are also driven by global cultural ‘need’ as well as “changes in man’s attitudes” and “the cultural expressions that arise”?
Thank you for helping me to think. Chris
anthonynorth said
Hi Chris,
I like your addition.
I suppose what it boils down to is our minds are always that little bit fragmented, but also compliant to culture as well as ourselves.
This is why we fall into consensual living so easily. And various consensual ’systems’ clash, thus offering us allegiance to one thing and animosity to another.
Maybe this subsumes the ‘angel’ inside you refer to.
totaltransformation said
Now how does this relate to the wide spread UFO sightings (or is it sitings?) of our time? I actually tuned in and watched a whole episode of Larry King where they had some physicist who believes in alien visitors to this world (that the U.S. government is covering up) argued with Bill Nye the science guy. The back and forth was priceless.
anthonynorth said
Hi TT,
I think it’s all to do with cultural expectation. The ancients saw gods on flying chariots, there are reports of Medieval sailing ships in the sky, during the 19th century people saw ghostly air ships.
If you want a read, I’ve condensed most of my own ideas on the UFO here:
http://beyondtheblog.wordpress.com/category/ufo-tastic
cugerbrant said
To experience the ‘paranormal’ you must rid yourself of all your earthly desires. Clear your mind all hedonistic needs, wants and the frustrations. These create barriers which clog your mind. You will experience it all around you. Clearly visible to your perceptions. Suffering does it, poverty, does it, loss does it. It is a bit like being told you have cancer really. You are brought back to reality with a shock. All the ‘relevant things you chase but never really need, are gone and the truth of you, your life, death, quite open to you. Do you really want to see?
Cuger Brant
anthonynorth said
Hi Cuger Brant,
What you are talking of here is mysticism or even mediumship. Many people glimpse the paranormal momentarily, occasionally. And their experiences are just as important.
Keith Fagan said
While your ideas certainly have merit, the theory does appear to be a bit too tidy for my tastes. You make it sound like the Victorians invented ghosts, or new agers invented angels. Such things have been reported for millennia, including UFO’s. Your notion of cultural expectation regarding them seems a little more developed. actually, it seems to fit in well with a concept I’ve investigated.
Personally, I’ve explored the notion of the entity as a necessary cultural icon- societies seem to need such concepts. It is not so much what they represent that changes over time (Although this is certainly true), but where they are said to be located. In the ancient world, it was very easy to place cyclops, cynocephalic men, arimaspians and the like simply outside your cultural sphere of influence, say Russia or Ethiopia if you were Greek. When Ethiopia becomes reachable, lo and behold, these entities move on to Afghanistan.
By the age of exploration, all of this cultural baggage is unloaded upon the new world (Although a few choice specimens remained for the mysterious Orient). By the 1800’s, the world is a much smaller place, with little room where our cherished entities could safely dwell. Perhaps the spiritualism movement is a part of that, that’s a very interesting idea I hadn’t actually considered. The new location favoured by many of that time becomes underground, a notion most fully expressed in the concept of the hollow Earth. The Shaver mystery renewed this concept, and we occasionally still see it emerge in theories of hidden alien bases or Nazi supertechnology bases in the Antarctic (Gateway to the hollow Earth for many a Victorian), but by the modern era even below ground seemed to have been explored, and the poles reached and found to be mundanely devoid of holes. Where could the entities come from, now that the whole world had essentially been explored? Enter the space age, and the coming of the space brothers, greys, reptiloids, and other cosmic entities.
No doubt, cultural expectation does play a big part here, as in each age, it is what lies beyond the realm of understanding or everyday experience that captures the minds and imaginations of the people- The Greeks wonder what might lie beyond the borders of the Mediterranean, the Victorians wonder what they might find at he undiscovered poles or beneath the Earth, and modern man dreams of the stars. What they find there, in every case, is that they are unknowingly looking into a mirror, exploring aspects of themselves, even when these entities appear to be the inverse of their cultural norms.
All too often these entities represent a deep-seated cultural fear, most commonly the simple fear of the “other.” This is where we most clearly see the entity as inversion of the society that conceives of it. For the Greeks, many of their entities possessed grossly disproportionate limbs of one kind or another, or lacked them, or had them in the wrong place (Like a face in their chests for the Arismaspians). They were an inversion of the importance they placed upon physical beauty. For the European explorers, America was symbolically depicted as an Amazon, which the lands were said to be full of. The Amazon was the inversion of the rigidly ordered, patriarchal, “civilized” society of Europe, she was chaotic, wild, and of course, matriarchal. It would have been much the same for the Greeks, who invented Amazons (Although there is good evidence that the Sarmatians were strongly matriarchal, a possible historic origin of the myth).
For modern expressions, look to the alien entities. The Greys are cold and emotionless as they probe their victims, expressing our fears of science and technology. The Reptiloids seem obsessed with violence and sex, our base, reptilian brains finding expression here. And almost all of them have warned us of the dangers of world war and environmental devastation, best expressed in the free love, universalist space brothers of the 1950’s. They appear as a positive to better hold up the mirror to our cultural negative.
All of this, of course, completely fails to address the possible physical reality of any of these entities either, which is a different matter entirely.
Anyway, thanks for spawning this intellectual dialogue, I hope I’ve provided a little food for thought on the subject.
anthonynorth said
Hi Keith,
Thanks for that. One small point, I do point out that this natural history concerns popularity of particular entity-types, and not a particular time creating them.
I like the way you place the cultural expectation, though. I can see this playing a part, certainly. But I’m not sure you address the fact that many entities can also seem comforting, particularly regarding spirits and ghosts. Following alien abductions, the psychological changes can be beneficial.
It is certainly a fascinating subject, though.
Rob said
While I like the article, there are some major flaws in the logic. Ghosts being one, all the way back to early Celtic times people have been afraid of ghosts…as ghosts. The spirits of dead ancestors buried in barrows on the moors. This was quite popular at the time. They also had other entities, some animal/plants(i.e. Druids) some human (i.e. The Great Hunt). On top of that they had a whole pantheon of God’s and Goddesses. All within the same time frame. There were several religions Druidism, Celtic Paganism all which brought their own versions of entities to the table, all on an island roughly the size of Connecticut. So I am quite dubious of your article and that we affect how entities appear. Ghosts have always been ghosts. The rest was fantasy made up by man to either control the masses or cram a religion down their throat.
AnthonyNorth said
Hi Rob,
The key words are, I think, these:
‘Of course, various entities have always been seen, but there is a distinct pattern to predominant entities throughout history.’
It is the particular type of entity we latch onto at a particular time I am talking about, sometimes, as you say, ‘a fantasy’, but placed onto existing forms as a kind of media-form.
As for the entities you speak about in Celtic times, I’d be surprised if ghosts were not around, but we cannot say so historically. We can deduce it from the snippets and myths we have, but we cannot know it. There isn’t enough recorded from the period.
Cuger Brant said
anthonynorth Says:
July 28, 2008 at 9:16 pm
No i’m not Tony. i’m talking about suffering leading to real perception. When i say “do you really want to see” i am talking about the path to these concepts, revelations, experiences.
Trust me i know. some of us see hedonistic, safe, from the inside of a cotton wool ball, life. A few, a very few, see life in the raw. take it on board and actually experience, see, form concepts of life that mean something. A bit like a revelation really. Most just want to see what keeps them comfortable, stops them worrying, etc. they dig a hole for themselves and name it ‘esoteric prig’ and lay in it until their boring lives are extinguished. There really is LIFE after life. This is not a slur on you or anyone, just an observation by me on humanity at large. I love your site( wish i had the know how to make one) Kind regards,
Cuger Brant.
anthonynorth said
Hi Cuger Brant,
Thanks for that. As I say many times, I never challenge another person’s peacefully held beliefs. You may be right. I see it differently. It causes debate – which is always important.