BEYOND THE BLOG

I've moved to anthonynorth.com

  • Introduction

    I've now moved to a new website and blog. Click 'Anthony North', below.
  • Stats:

    • 711,475 hits
  • Meta

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Calendar

AFTERLIFE

Posted by anthonynorth on June 24, 2007

beta-obe.jpg We all know about it, whether it exists or not. We know of ghosts and reincarnated entities, and we all have some knowledge of the idea that we might experience afterlife upon death.
Philosophers and priests have thought about it for as long as thinking man has existed. Alternatively, scientists have tried their best to sweep it under a thread-bare carpet. So what is the reality of afterlife?

POLITICS AND MORALITY

The first thing to realize about afterlife is that it has been quite useful in the life we class as ‘living.’ Medieval Christendom split Afterlife into Heaven and Hell, and applied transgressing The Ten Commandments to eternal redemption.
This was a means of social and moral control, using superstition to scare people into obedience. A similar concept exists in the east, where karma is a moral imperative towards good so as not to be reincarnated in a lower status next time.
Christianity went so far as to debar mere mortals from experiencing evidence of afterlife in life. To do so was to be Christ-like, and only Jesus was such. Hence, those who claimed communion with entities in life were classed as ‘evil’, dealing with the Devil. In this way, Christianity attempted to banish paganism and the occult.

INDIVIDUAL PROBLEMS

In the above, we can see that Afterlife is a useful system of control, guaranteeing its survival as a concept within religious society. But today, science and individuality has banished the idea and classed it as nonsense.
Individuality has to ignore Afterlife, for it implies something above the individual. But individuals continue to form societies and cultures. Our place in a society is defined by cultural interpretation. Hence, there is something above the individual.
In light of this, could we argue that culture, or even our species, could be a continuing communal entity in its own right? If we are prepared to accept such a thing – and history itself shows a form of continuance above the individual – then we begin the philosophical step towards the idea of continuance after life.

WHAT WE KNOW SURVIVES

We do actually know that much of ‘us’ does survive death. For instance, there are memories of us in other people’s minds. If naturally buried, our organic body decays and released nutrients for renewal of nature.
If we go even deeper into the ‘construction’ of life we are fundamentally an electrical vibration of the subatomic field – an astral body, as it were. Here, the particles that make up the ‘vibration’ are identical to similar particles throughout the universe. And guess what – they survive our death.
There are ideas in fringe physics that this field forms an ‘information universe’. In other words, the information available to the universe is within its construction, which would logically include its history. Does this constitute a form of ‘survival’?

WHERE IS CONSCIOUSNESS?

One of the great metaphysical debates revolves around the location of consciousness. It is said to reside in the brain, but if information is in the subatomic field, could what we class as the mind be simply an individual segment of this universal consciousness?
A materialist would class this as ridiculous. We can track certain brain functions, and are aware of their existence in the brain. To which I would ask: could the brain be simply analogous to a computer? If so, we haven’t yet found the software.
Many believe the Near Death Experience shows evidence of our personal consciousness going to the universal – in this case, down a dark tunnel where a light is met, and a decision taken whether you shall live or die.

DEATH AND REBIRTH

I’m not sure whether this is evidence of survival, but certainly a strange phenomenon occurs within the experience. Indeed, research has shown that even a deep faint can include imagery of what is culturally accepted as Afterlife.
This is particularly interesting as early tribal ritual revolved around hysterical ceremony, leading to the deep faint of a shaman-like individual. In the faint he is said to visit the Afterlife and return with knowledge thereof.
The shaman can be seen to have believed the faint involved a ‘death’, followed by rebirth upon awakening. This process actually formed the central proof of Afterlife within mythology. Yet realistically we can argue this is a symbolic, psychologically induced Afterlife rather than the real thing.

EVIDENCE OF SURVIVAL

In the above we can see the possibility of a ‘symbolic’ Afterlife, sculpted by impressions of a particular culture, which we went on to believe was ‘real.’ But nonetheless, it could have formed the basic proofs that led to religion and spirituality.
Other ‘proofs’ of Afterlife are said to include sightings of ghosts, mediumistic talents and evidence of reincarnation. However, again, we can argue that all this evidence can be found in the known psychological anomalies of the human mind.
Indeed cryptomnesia (the ability to remember obscure facts), multiple personality, hallucination and other mechanisms can adequately explain evidence of such survival. For further information on these mechanisms, posts can be found by clicking Paranormal UFO Occult at the bottom of this post.

TOWARDS UNDERSTANDING

This said, there are problems with our understanding of life and the universe that are not adequately addressed by science. For instance, it is known that the body exists as a co-ordinated lifeform, but it also exists as a congregation of cells, etc; and at its fundamental level, as an electrical vibration, as already mentioned.
Science accepts this, but is hazy when it comes to the relationship between each of these levels. But surely, if one leads to another, then interaction between the three levels must take place.
This logical assumption tells us that, if the information universe is a reality, then somehow it must connect to the conscious life form – i.e. us. Hence, if consciousness is in the information universe, we must ask: does it die upon death of the body? Or does it continue as some form of existence?

FUTURE SCIENCE

We are not at the stage of knowledge where we can answer. This is mainly because we are not asking the right questions, which should be: Do we live in an information universe or not? Is our ‘electrical vibration’ related to us or not?
A negative answer to either of these questions leaves us disconnected from the rest of existence, which is ridiculous. A positive answer leaves room for the tantalizing existence of an Afterlife of some kind.
And seeing that it would imply a connection between ‘us’ and the universe, then knowledge of this survival would be in the information universe. So therefore, somewhere, we would be aware of this.
So who knows, maybe SOME of those ghosts, communications and possessions are from somewhere else after all. Once we have discounted the fraudulent, spurious and delusional, of course.

© Anthony North, June 2007

Paranormal UFO Occult
For more paranormal see Mysteries page above
Click Tony On for current affairs

9 Responses to “AFTERLIFE”

  1. There’s nothing new about what you said, it boils out to one thing, still unexplainable, unfathomable. And much money is made out of the confusion. Try to have just one reference, that is, the Christians’ Holy Bible, it has enough answers for salvation and afterlife.

  2. Seven said

    I enjoyed this post!

    From a Buddhist view, it is not “us” that takes rebirth because there is no permanent soul/self but only consciousness that moves from life to life. So when the end of this life comes, so does the end of this “I”.

    Of course the idea that “I” gets to live on after death is a lovely idea, but which “I”?? The “I” that existed was when I was 5? The “I” that exists now? The “I” I will become when I’m 65? Just adds, to me at least, makes the idea of some eternal afterlife more problematic.

  3. Geo said

    I think! Therefore, I am…

    Conscientiousness…

    Death is death… When we die… we are dead. The Bible wholly supports this. Ye I walk in the valley of the dark…

    One has to ask, “What is hell then?” Hell is Death… We are all going to hell is truth… Jesus went to hell… Jesus was resurrected… And, so shall we… There is the after life… our own resurrection. Only one who is absolutely perfect will be resurrected… So, because we are not perfect, we will spend eternity in hell (death). Never to know ourselves. Never to remember those things that we know now. Never to touch. Never to love. Not even to feel anger, again… Nothing but emptiness. Heaven is to be resurrected. Jesus died on the cross as a sacrificial lamb. Because we can not be perfect enough to be resurrected, it is through him that we will be resurrected. It is through his blood that we are born into the new life.

    Not even the religions understand this. They get it all wrong. They speak of purgatory. They speak of firey hell. They speak of heaven as though it is a mystical place. When all along, it is right here… If we had the ability to be perfect, this would be heaven… But, it is that we cannot live without sin that makes us end in hell.

    I must tell you… And I say this with sincere firmness…

    There are MANY misconceptions written within the Bible! No one ever lived 1000 years… The Bible actually supports evolution… Adam and Eve weren’t the only humans living when they were in the garden of Eden… It is not that those before us conspired to deceive us. It is that they decoded writings from a language that hadn’t been written, or spoken in a 1000 years before they found the writings. They translated the writings into concepts they understood at that time. And, this was from a people that felt the world was flat, and the moon was made of cheese… What concepts do you think they translated the material into?

    I strongly believe that the Bible speaks truth, but that man’s misconception of that truth is not supported by the Bible.

    Anyone can take a verse from this page, and another form a different page, and still another from a completely different page. Put them together to make the Bible say what the person wants it to mean.

    Look at what is written as a whole… Look at the history behind the words. Understand what is going on and why it is written… Example:

    Homosexuality… Paul wrote against homosexuality. I believe what is written is conceptual and not actual… Paul was the only disciple that was also a Roman Citizen. Rome, at the time, was a society that men having sex with each other was politically required. Women were only there for the sake of having more children. Their level within that society was nothing more. Now, Paul spoke out against hommosexuality for two reasons. When the Christ died, he wiped away ALL sin… Even the first one. Thus, women were no longer deemed subservient in God’s eyes. However, men liked the authority… so, it only took 2000 years before anyone understood this. The other reason is that it is wrong for a society to force homosexuality on people that do not want a relationship like this… But, it is equally wrong for a society to force people not to be able to have a relationship like this.

    God is love, and love cannot be denied… As I said to a pedophile preacher… Yours is aledgedly a forgivable sin. But for someone to love another of the same gender, is not…

    Sorry… I just realized I am off subject… I think the point is that Neither Science, or the Religions have it correct… Yet, both are not wrong either. It is like two people walking down a stairway. Each travel the same path, but each view that path from a different perspective.

    It’s time to wipe the slate and start over on what we think to be “TRUTH”

    If you are interested in learning more of my views, contact me at gejepsen@yahoo.com

    ~Geo

  4. Geo said

    Oops, sorry…

    I mean… That it is like two people walking on a stairway. One is walking down while the other is walking up… Each travel the same path, but each view the path from their own perspective… It isn’t until they meet somewhere in the middle that truth will be born.

  5. anthonynorth said

    Quote from Geo:

    ‘Anyone can take a verse from this page, and another form a different page, and still another from a completely different page. Put them together to make the Bible say what the person wants it to mean.’

    Including you, perhaps?

  6. Just be openminded and read again what has been written in these post(most especially the comments). Some seems to be talking logically, that is, when they speak of what is written and what is known as far reference are concerned, things that has been proven. But analyze the sentences when they begin to reason out, that is, when they begin to interpret, suggest and advise! The logic, the truth, those that were mentioned become adulterated, and what has become of the reader? They turned out more confused!

    I suggest a blank slate and relearn.

    I invite you to read posts at esoriano.wordpress.com

  7. jecoka said

    I enjoyed the article and it gave me food for thought. The bible babble. is just that. Haven’t we all played the game of “rumor”? “Daves dog has fleas.” turns into “Dan”s dad got shot.” by the time it gets around the room. How can anyone take a book that was written hundreds of years after the events it describes, be taken as truth?

  8. MLoki said

    Hey Tony,I just read your article and as usual found it fascinating.I find as im rounding the corner of fifty now my thoughts dwell a bit more on the afterlife etc.Ive always been very interested in religious philosophy,the occult,the paranormal etc.The hell of it is tony,the older i get the less i find i really know.It seems the more i learn or research the more the questions keep coming.Anyway,i love your site and im an avid reader,thanks for keeping me thinking,great job. MLoki

  9. Hi MLoki,
    Thanks for that. Yes, we do tend to think of such things as we get older. And as I see it, whenever we answer a mystery, an infinite number of others open up as we precariously extend our knowledge.

Leave a comment