BEYOND THE BLOG

I've moved to anthonynorth.com

  • Introduction

    I've now moved to a new website and blog. Click 'Anthony North', below.
  • Stats:

    • 711,475 hits
  • Meta

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Calendar

    November 2008
    M T W T F S S
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930

THE ETERNAL NOW

Posted by anthonynorth on November 6, 2008

Have you tried my current affairs? Stay informed.
Also, fiction and poetry.

Foretelling the future is one of the trickiest areas of the paranormal. Within known theorizing, there is very little of a concrete nature that can suggest it is possible. Hence, much skepticism is placed on the subject.
For my own research, I’ve looked at the idea that possible future outcomes can be gleaned by unconscious knowledge and intuitions in the present. However, I won’t bore the reader by going over these ‘mechanisms’ again.

I want to look further than that.

For whilst I still accept most cases of precognition and divination can be answered in the present, I also think a hypothesis is possible regarding a real ability to foretell the future.
I don’t offer this as a definite concept that can be understood by science at this time. Rather, I want to explore the possibility philosophically. And it begins with asking: what is ‘now’?

‘Now’ cannot be experienced.

What we think of as ‘now’ is the point in time when information from the universe is synchronously received by our senses. We, as ‘observers’, are passive. And be it sound, light, or any other force in the universe, it takes time to reach us.
Hence, depending on distance, all our observations come from different times in the past. This is most apparent with lightning, which produces sound and light at the same moment, but we receive one before the other. Some stars we only observe after traveling for billions of years.

Entropy holds similar problems.

This is the decay, as time progresses, of everything in the universe. Yet our appreciation of entropy could be faulty, in that we view it in terms of individuality.
For instance, if we think of our genetic code, this continues for much longer than ourselves. We think of decay of the planetary environment, but in the universal scheme of things, this could be no more important than the almost unnoticed decay and replacement of cells in the body. Basically, our appreciation of entropy could be a local event.

We view existence, in the west, in terms of the ‘linear’.

This means there is a beginning and an end, and advancement or decay occurs between the two. However, this appreciation is modern. Previously the world was viewed as ‘cyclic’, where apparent decay is simply the process to the beginning of a new cycle. Entropy and time have an eternal appreciation in such a model.
I have previously put forward the idea that there is more than our existence. There is a ‘law of large numbers’ which argues that greater order arises out of greater numbers of things.
I’ve identified seven ‘clusterings’ of existence, each involving larger numbers than the previous, and therefore offering the possibility of greater order. These are the individual lifeform, the species, the planet, the solar system, the galaxy, the island universe, and the universe itself.
As we can see, ‘man’ is the lowest, and therefore has the least order. Paranormal information talents such as telepathy theoretically involve the next level – the species. Mind over matter could theoretically arise from the next level, the planetary, which involves physicality.
What would happen if human consciousness could descend to even deeper levels of clustering? Could, at some point, our appreciation of time change to something more cyclic – perhaps even appreciating an ‘eternal’ now, where everything that occurs in the universe does so outside time?
Such a hypothesis would require consciousness to exist at the fundamental level of the universe – something that has always been believed my mystics. And ideas in particle physics allow for both this timelessness and consciousness.
Particle interaction occurs spontaneously, regardless of distance, and therefore regardless of time. Similarly, many theorise that it is an act of observation that creates the reality we experience. Or should that be an observation by a lesser level of existence?
Mystics speak of fate as if everything is already ‘written’. Perhaps, at higher levels of existence, it is, but is beyond our understanding and experience. We simply live and experience at the level in which we exist.
But if, at times, we can descend deep enough into consciousness to intuit information from such higher levels, then the eternal now is glimpsed, and our future can be perceived. And perhaps even more than this.
An eternal now would suggest that everything exists in a moment, including the living AND the dead. Does this give a hint of an understanding of not only Afterlife, but Heaven itself?

© Anthony North, November 2008

27 Responses to “THE ETERNAL NOW”

  1. Twilight said

    It’s a deep, deep topic isn’t it, AN? Boggles the mind !
    I do think the Universe is a humungous entity of which we and our planet and our galaxy are are all “cells”, connected; and because interconnected could be inter-accessible. But that’s as far as my brain will take me. Or as far as my ability to put it into words will allow. You have an enviable ability to condense a very difficult topic and make it clear. 🙂

  2. Hi Twilight,
    Thanks for those kind words. I put it down to many years of OCD when it comes to working things out 🙂
    Yes, I’m sure we’re interconnected in ways not yet understood, and different levels of understanding can be had.

  3. What Twilight said. Deep for sure. I think there is much we don’t know and much we will never know. Great food for thought. Have a great day Anthony. Sandee now leave scratching head. 🙂

  4. Hi Sandee,
    Scratching head is good – as long as it’s to do with ideas 🙂

  5. Tina said

    the paranormal always intrigue me into what is the unknown. the less you know the more you want to. such stories always fascinate me.

  6. Hi Tina,
    Personally I think it is one of the most important, and most neglected subjects there is. Important because it tells us so much about ourselves and our universe; neglected because science shies away from it through fear.

  7. Madeline L’Engle’s work got at this idea of the eternal now. That wrinkle is everything.

  8. Chris said

    Hi Anthony,
    I’m definitely in favour of the ‘cyclic’ approach. We see it all the time in the world, its how our eco-sytems ‘work’ and flourish.
    Birth, life, death and decomposition (fertilization) leading to renewal or ‘re-birth’. It seems to work for our planet, why not the entire Universe?
    I prefer to think of erosion as being one part of a cyclic process rather than being a ‘beast’ of entropic nature.

  9. Selma said

    I like the idea of the eternal now. It elaborates on a fledgling belief I have along similar lines as a result of some of my paranormal experiences. Maybe all of our differing levels of existence are happening at the same time, all the time. Before, now and after all at once. You are on to something, for sure. Thought-provoking!

  10. Hi Sandy,
    I’ve never read this writer. I must rectify this.

    Hi Chris,
    Yes, I’m sure this is the right approach. The problem is, science correctly works with reductionism, which could never see this. And this is why I’m convinced we need an intellectual bedfellow to counter what is missed through reductionism.

    Hi Selma,
    Thanks for that. Yes, philosophically it makes a lot of sense – even if there is no proof as yet.

  11. Chris said

    Hi Anthony,
    Yes, there are not enough of ‘us’, or is there? As Lauri said on Selma’s “Ask The Wind” post, “What can one person do? My answer: Sister Emmanuel, Nelson Mandela…..etc”.
    I think that we might be talking about generalists versus specialists again, strange how it always seems to be antagonistic.
    I wonder what wonderful sort of ‘creation’ might arise if Philosophy andd Science were bedfellows again? And I know that you have raised this before. Yep, its definitely ‘cyclic’. Sorry, I can’t ‘say’ that can I, its insufficiently moderate! 🙂

  12. Hi Chris,
    Oh, it will happen one day. It would be nice to be around when it does, though 🙂

  13. huh said

    You think cycles is the way to view things, huh? But then you’ll be dead so how can you enjoy the new cycle when your dead? Unless there is life after death, from which you might get a little better perspective on the eternal.

    I’m going to give you a little help here, if you want to know some things about the future go to the Bible. What counts now is not the future, but whether you take care of your fellow man in the now. Because who will ultimately Live in the eternal are those who Trust the infinite God in the now. The God who is revealing his character through the way He deals with mankind.

  14. Hi Huh,
    Of course you look after your fellow man. I assume you don’t come here for my current affairs. If you did, you wouldn’t point out such a thing to me.
    But there’s more, and I’m not talking about God or afterlife here. I’m talking about the human endeavour to better ourselves, to seek knowledge, for each generation to add to our history.
    I suspect you’re too hooked on the individual to understand this.

  15. […] The Eternal Now Have you tried my current affairs? Stay informed. Also, fiction and poetry. Foretelling the future is one of the […] […]

  16. huh said

    Your right I don’t come to the blog to check out current events. But I, sometimes, am puzzled by your blog posts and wonder about the logic. If what you seek is knowledge, then I suppose you seek it logically. But you went for the last part of my comment and skipped over a reasonable question – may your logic serve you and mankind well.

  17. Hi Huh,
    In what way did I skip your question? You asked:

    ‘You think cycles is the way to view things, huh? But then you’ll be dead so how can you enjoy the new cycle when your dead? Unless there is life after death, from which you might get a little better perspective on the eternal.’

    I replied:

    ‘I’m talking about the human endeavour to better ourselves, to seek knowledge, for each generation to add to our history.
    I suspect you’re too hooked on the individual to understand this.’

    What do I mean here? I mean it doesn’t matter if I’m dead. Knowledge is bigger than any person, any generation. It constantly compiles itself within the species. THIS is eternal. And it is obscured by the individual.
    My reply was a direct answer to your question.

  18. Chris said

    Hi Anthony,
    I’ve got that ‘suspicious feeling’ that here we go again!
    I wonder, why is it that so many people ‘view’ things from the physical rather than the metaphysical?

    I’m just trying to remember that other ‘answer’ you gave me in another discussion, I think that it was something like, “I encourage wide debate…..For many reasons.”, thank God for that! 🙂

  19. Hi Chris,
    Because you fall off the edge of the unknown, don’t you know 😉

  20. huh said

    I hope I’m not being a nuisance and that a little debate is fine. Wierdly enough I try to view things from a metaphysical rather than purely physical, but both are a part of life and deserve to be looked at.

    I suppose my question was asked a bit vague, but I think it is one that packs a punch.

    First off we are all individuals and no matter how much we will go on to incorporate the group thinking and group wellfare into our own lives and thinking – we must start with: we are but one individual, the world is made up of individuals – and now how can we speak to those individuals about ougtness, or right and wrong, or eternality rationally.

    And if as you said in your previous comment we are not talking about God or the afterlife but merely the eternal, then the question must be asked rationally “how does the eternal mean anything to a consciousness and that loses conscious”? Is it not the now or the soon to be now that matters much more than future generations?

    I know you would say that I am looking at things individually, but if that is so what would be your reason for me (an individual) and the world (made up of individuals) to care for something we will soon know nothing about? From a logical standpoint.

    I think it is a serious question, all be it asked crassly.

  21. Hi Huh,
    You’re not being a nuisance at all, and I DO always encourage debate. Although I do tend to answer people in the same spirit in which they ask the question 🙂
    It all seems to revolve around the individual and ‘now’. This is pertinent because what we consider the individual ‘now’ is not what it has been in the past.
    Childhood is essential to individuality, yet childhood is a 19th century invention to provide time to educate a professional class. Prior to this – and at that time if not middleclass – a male ‘child’ of ten would be doing man’s work. Not long before this, a twelve year old female ‘child’ would be suckling her first baby – quite possibly to a man in his forties.
    How does today’s idea of the ‘individual’ fit into this?
    Go back to our earliest texts such as the Iliad or Epic of Gilgamesh and you’ll find there was no such thing as introspection. When we have an internal dialogue we know it is with our own mind. These texts show this process as asking questions of the gods. The gods were literally perceived as being inside our minds, with no sense of the individual.
    Fast forward to the 1950s – those crass TV ads selling washing powder in pretty little wifey, slaving away in the kitchen. Yet, advertisers wouldn’t have displayed such images if they did not connect with the norm of 1950’s womanhood.
    The point I’m making is that our present understanding of the ‘individual’ is just a moment in time, and not something cast in stone. It is part of the ‘eternal’ process of our advancement, devolution, knowledge, call it what you will. So seeing back to how we have become is just as important as what we are now. And if this is so, relating it to what we may become is possibly just as important.
    This doesn’t mean that we should not theorise on the individual now, and analyse the concept in terms of now. It is simply that we can possibly get a more rounded appreciation of ‘now’ be seeing also where we’ve been, and where we’re likely to go. Especially if, as I see it, the major changes are only culture deep. Many impulses we see as new to us are simply old processes in new clothes. Hence the ‘cycles’ I speak of.
    I think I’ve grasped what you mean, here.

  22. Chris said

    Hi Anthony,
    Salutations!

  23. Hi Chris,
    Thank you, sir.

  24. Hi Anthony, this is loaded! This is not the time or the place for me to stick my two bob down.
    But you’re articulating what I can only dream.

    Great post.

  25. Hi Andy,
    Thanks for that. A very kind comment. Debates following my essays are often loaded. Debate in the raw. It’s good.

  26. ShamrockGold said

    Hiya,

    I just wanted to say that your post on the human mind through history was profound and actually immediately caused me to come to a better understanding of a larger reality.

    I realized at some point that the great majority of my thought processes had been socially conditioned and prevented me from feeling true intuition. However, since I’ve restructured my diet to be comprised of wholesome, organic foods and very few, if any, packaged items, I’ve found that my urges and desires are actually physical manifestations of my interconnection to the greater spirit of mankind in that such gut instincts will lead me to synchronistically connect with other individuals merely because we each had the same inclination. This effectively proves the nonexistence of time and physically reality as we have been taught to see it as many encounters I’ve had could only have been made possible with absolute to-the-second timing using the linear view of reality.

    Also, in regards to the post on human consciousness, death is but a frame in the cycle of life. Buddhism teaches us that life on Earth as a human being is an endless round known as Samsara where we die and become born again and again until we attain enlightenment by learning the values of compassion and empathy and become present enough in our bodies to recognize the suffering all around us and how we are connected to it by the choices we make in what we buy or do. Only then can we advance to the next stage of consciousness in the form of our essence, our immortal soul which is beyond this one lifetime and many others and whose knowledge and abilities are revealed only in fragments as needed for advancement.

    Sorry to bust in here with all this esoteric talk. I started by reading your post on bubbles of consciousness displayed at 2012studios, Anthony, and followed a link to here where I became so excited by what I was reading that I couldn’t help but pour out a number of thoughts that I’ve had no other useful outlet for. Thanks for being a bright beacon. ^_^

  27. Hi ShamrockGold,
    Many thanks for those kind words. Yes, we all seem to get tied up in the physical world at the expense of the spiritual – whatever that is, exactly.
    Eastern philosophies have a great deal to teach us, and one thing I’ve noticed is that an understanding of the deeper, esoteric processes actually help us to live in the physical.
    If you’re enjoying my regular essays here, I’ve linked to most of them on my ‘Y’ Files page, accessed from THE UNEXPLAINED at top of the site.

Leave a comment