BEYOND THE BLOG

I've moved to anthonynorth.com

  • Introduction

    I've now moved to a new website and blog. Click 'Anthony North', below.
  • Stats:

    • 711,475 hits
  • Meta

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Calendar

SAUCER RECOVERY

Posted by anthonynorth on August 15, 2007

flying-saucer.jpg Most people have heard of the crashed flying saucer at Roswell, New Mexico. But this was not the only supposed crash of an alien craft.
One of the earliest recorded UFO crashes is said to have happened on 6 June 1884 when a blazing object crashed in Dundy County, Nebraska. Local farmhands rushed to the scene and found sand fused to a glass-like substance, and a large pile of hot debris. One person who got too close suffered blisters similar to radiation exposure today. It took several days for the debris to cool down, whereupon the local paper reported it was extremely light metal but incredibly strong. It could have been aluminium, except it had not yet been invented. Local papers of the time even speculated the object could have come from outer space.

THEY KEEP COMING DOWN

Researcher Todd Zechel learnt from witnesses about a possible UFO retrieval when a saucer crashed in Laredo, Texas, on 7 July 1948. Prior to the crash, the 90 foot disc was seen by pilots, and said to be travelling at 2,000mph. Witnesses at the crash site spoke of a craft being taken away by US forces, and that a hairless, four foot alien had died there.
At the time it was dismissed as a hoax, and government papers since released show that Nazi V2 rockets were being modified in the area at the time.
Researcher Ivan Sanderson collected sighting reports of an object that flew over the Great Lakes on 9 December 1965. Towards early evening there was a boom in the sky, followed by a trail of smoke and a tremor shook the ground in a wood near Kecksburg, Pennsylvania. A Soviet rocket, Cosmos 96, had re-entered that day, but 13 hours earlier.
In 1980, the fire chief who attended the incident finally told that he saw a conical craft 12 feet high embedded in the ground, but they were cleared away by the military. Later that night, a truck left the site, the military claiming nothing was found.

TOLD AFTER THE FACT

In 1973, US scientist Fritz Werner contacted UFOlogist Ray Fowler, telling him of an event at Kingman, Arizona, on 20 May 1953. Picked up by a blacked-out bus, he and over a dozen other scientists were taken out into the wilderness to do tests on a 30 foot diameter disc embedded in the soil.
Taking a quick peek into nearby tents, Werner observed the body of a four foot alien in a silver suit. Four years after Werner had told his story, confirmation came from a pilot, then at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio. He knew of crates being received one night in mid-1953 containing wreckage with strange writing on it, and the bodies of three aliens packed in dry ice.

THE BOYS FROM BRAZIL

One of the latest episodes comes from Brazil. In the early hours of the morning of 20 January 1996, a farmer outside the city of Varginha saw a bus-sized object hovering above the ground spewing smoke.
By 08.30, the fire department received an anonymous call about a bizarre creature in the Jardim Abdere neighbourhood. When they arrived at the scene they found a group of adults chasing the creature which was bald, brown-skinned, had bulging, blood-red eyes and strange limbs. Capturing it, it was driven away in an army truck.
Rumours circulated that there had been more than one creature, and platoons of soldiers were seen throughout the day, with sporadic machine gun fire. At 15.30 hrs the Da Silva sisters were walking across a field when they saw a creature hiding fearfully behind a brick wall.
Within 24 hours of the first sighting of the craft, three extraterrestrials are said to have been taken to a Hospital, where medical tests killed at least one of them. The following day, bodies of the aliens were said to have been transferred to the University of Campinas, never to be heard of again as a military cover-up attempted to deny anything had occurred.

MILITARY MIS-IDENTIFICATION

Could the above have been real extraterrestrial events, or could something else be going on? There seem to be several factors identical to most of these episodes. First of all, something appeared to crash. And second, in many cases, it isn’t until many years later that people come forward to talk about it.
As these incidences usually revolve around military personnel, it is taken for granted that aerial phenomena that led to the ‘crash’ could not have been mis-identified. Yet how valid is this assumption?
As an ex-military man myself, I can testify to numerous exercises where personnel have ended up chasing shadows. A report comes in of an incident in the dead of night and it is soon blown up out of all proportion, with personnel regularly ‘seeing’ things that are not there.
The process can lead to a form of induced, and communal, self-hypnosis. You know that what is going on cannot be real, but your senses conflict with what you’re seeing. The Angels of Mons is not the only time such incidences have occurred, usually fuelled by fatigue followed by a rush of adrenalin.

A RECURRING THEME

After the event – a form of communal hallucination – the personnel involved feel rather stupid, and the authorities conspire to keep the event quiet. After all, it is inadvisable to let it be known that the military can occasionally seem to go insane.
Over the years, the personnel put the experience to the back of the mind, but as a culture forms out of research by non-military investigators, ‘false memories’ begin to form of what actually happened. And in no time at all, you’re sure that, as the books say, such events really did happen.
Hence, the result is a continuing culture of saucer crashes, almost identical in every case, because they are more a product of the researcher’s mind than the actual experiencers.
Indeed, this is a theme that can be found again and again in all manner of ‘paranormal’ experience, from exact mechanisms behind past-life regression through hypnosis, to the archetypal alien abduction event.
Of course, I am not saying that saucer crashes are not exactly what they seem. I am merely saying the possibility of other cultural and psychological processes should not be discounted.

© Anthony North, August 2007

Have you clicked Diary of a Writer on Blogroll? Meet me, up close and personal.
Click Tony On, on Blogroll, for my current affairs blog.
If you like fiction, click Fiction Page on Blogroll for my short stories.
Check out the pages. Find my Links on Eye On the World.

4 Responses to “SAUCER RECOVERY”

  1. red pill junkie said

    Seems this year 2007 is bound to become the year of countless anniversaries: Roswell, Elvis, Heaven’s Gate…

    There’s another one that’s not that well known. On August 1977 (3-5 the apparent day) there was a report of a UFO that crashed in Puebla, Mexico. There’s a report here in this link (sorry, in spanish)

    http://www.elaviso.com/entretenimiento/?ContentID=4017

    It says that the journalists that rushed to the scene of the crash could not come too close because the mexican soldiers were restricting access. But some reporters noted that the mexican troops were following the orders of american soldiers (the mexican wore green fatigues and green helmets, while the others wore blue unifoms, gray and black with black helmets). A photographer managed to take a picture where the bushes and trees were burned from the crash, and of a burned trailer. The locals , who were very frightened, told the reporters the metallic object impacted the trailer when it crashed. Some local told that he saw the bodies of several “enanitos” (midgets) lying all over the site, wearing silver uniforms, and that he was too afraid to try to see if he could help them. He didn’t saw any blood on the bodies… the truck driver inside the trailer seemed to have been “charred to death” (“se achicharró”). Incidentally the burned truck was carrying asbesthos which is supposedly non-flammable.

    The official response was that it had been the remains of a soviet satellite. In either case the response time of the military personnel was incredibly rapid,that suggests me the soldiers had a good estimate of whre the object crashed regardless of the notice the local authoritis emmited. Were they monitoring the trajectory of the object before it impacted on Texiutlán, Puebla?

    Thought you might find it interesting 😉

  2. anthonynorth said

    Hi Red,
    Try this link

    http://ufologie.net/htm/crashes.htm

    It lists 132 alleged saucer recoveries, with links to any that have any credible information. It lists an event at Tabasco, Mexico, 17 Aug 77 – there are no links for additional info.
    It is difficult to know what to make of this one. The report you’ve linked is recently published, on a site that is advertising ‘girlie’ mags.
    It would be interesting to know, IF it is credible, when people came forward to ‘volunteer’ the information. If it was many years later, then the incident could fit into my idea above.

  3. red pill junkie said

    Yeah I admit the webpage is not very professional looking 😉 but what I found interesting is that the author of the article wrote in tems that lead to believe he took part of the investigation 30 years ago.

    There’s also you have to consider here: back in those days almost the only news media that covered such stories were tabloid-like news papers, like a paper called La Prensa which likes to put photos of bloody car crashes in its front page (!) That hasn’t changed much in the present.

    I found this other article which seems more objective:

    http://www.analuisacid.com/puebla_1977.htm

    It determines the date of the crash around July 29, 1977. So if the other article was telling the truth, themilitary showed up a week after the crash.

    It also tells that a piece of metal was recovered an analyzed, showing that it was

    0.28% de Carbon

    0.84% de Magnesium

    1.13% de Silicon

    0.77% de Chrome

    As you can see in this new webpage, its coll that they added actual news paper strips from that date, including a photo. It also seems to prove that the object couldn’t be te soviet satellite Kosmos 929, which seems to have been the official explanation for the event.

    On a final note, it also seems this case was investigated by the late Pedro Ferriz Santacruz; this man was pretty much the grand-daddy of ufology in latin america, and was a close friend of Dr. Hynek so that should tell something about his credentials. The website says Ferriz told Hynek about the incident and Hynek investigated himself, concluding the crashed object was not a satellite.

  4. anthonynorth said

    Good morning Red,
    It looks an interesting case, but what is particularly interesting is the fact that I’ve never come across it before, or if I have, it wasn’t strong enough to grab my attention.
    I’d be interested to know if you find anything more.

Leave a comment