BEYOND THE BLOG

I've moved to anthonynorth.com

  • Introduction

    I've now moved to a new website and blog. Click 'Anthony North', below.
  • Stats:

    • 711,475 hits
  • Meta

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Calendar

CHRISTIAN MYSTICS

Posted by anthonynorth on August 29, 2007

monks.jpg Mysticism is usually associated with the occult or eastern religions today, but Christianity had a number of mystics. Indeed, the monastic system was ideally designed to allow such mystics to exist.

SAINT BENEDICT

The father of western monasticism was St Benedict. Born about 480, he was sent to Rome for an education but was horrified by its decadence. At age 14 he fled to a village called Subiaco where he met a monk who took him to a cave.
Over the next three years he lived ass a hermit and developed miraculous powers from deep meditation. Going on to gain many followers, he organised 12 monasteries of 12 monks, each under a prior. In 525 he went to Monte Casino where he destroyed the pagan temple there and began to build the famous monastery.
Going about the country curing the sick, he also wrote ‘The Rule,’ laying down the guidelines for monastic life, including a probationary year, obedience to an abbot, asceticism and a life of work and prayer.
He described his mystical experiences as a taste of heavenly food following a flood of shining light. Seeing the whole world before his eyes, he could look down from above and see how small everything was.

ST HILDEGARD OF BINGEN

Another early mystic was St Hildegard of Bingen, born to a noble German family near Bingen in 1098. Influenced by local Celtic traditions, she had visions from an early age before being educated by Benedictines from age eight.
A prioress by 38, she was often ill and became an early feminist, believing in gender equality and even downplaying Eve’s role in the Fall. From her early 40s she began having illuminations about God, the soul and the interconnectedness of the universe.
Advising, in her ‘Scivias’, that all living things are sparks of radiance from God, she records 26 ‘illuminations’. With an interest in science and love of music, she travelled throughout Europe denouncing corruption and criticising monotheistic faiths as dried up, even celebrating human sexuality. She died in 1179 in her eighties.

JULIAN OF NORWICH

Julian of Norwich was an English mystic born about 1342. In her work, ‘The Revelation of Divine Love’, we read that in her youth she asked God for a severe illness to purge herself of worldly desires, as well as a vision of the Passion of Christ.
When she was 31 she fell gravely ill, prompting a number of visions. She described in one how she saw God in a twinkling of an eye. Propped up so she could gaze on a crucifix, she saw the crucified Christ. Then her chamber filled with blood before being grasped by the throat by the Devil, the damned all about her. Then she saw a cathedral on a mountaintop with Christ on a throne.
For the next 20 years she became a hermit within a convent to contemplate her visions, deciding that faith consisted of God’s love for his elect, and the soul’s need to return that love. Her revelation drew people to her, and she gained a reputation as a healer. When she died is unknown.

ST TERESA OF AVILA

A further Christian mystic worthy of mention is St Teresa of Avila, born in 1515 to a noble family near Avila in Castille. Her mother died when she was 15 and shortly after she became ill, beginning a series of illnesses that would plague her throughout her life.
At 20 she left home against her father’s wishes and became a nun. Due to improper care she experienced a coma for three days and upon recovery began intense daily meditations. In 1555 she began having visions. Many more were to follow.
She called them a ‘delectable death’ and included terrifying visions of hell. St Teresa classed the visions as the soul lifted out of the body and becoming awake to God. Writing a number of books about her visions, she claimed to experience a spiritual marriage with Christ. Going on to found some 17 convents, she died in 1582.

IN CONCLUSION

It was natural that the monastic system would create such mystics, and in their visions we can see many classic elements of the mystical experience, from symbolism of the Divine, to a feeling of Oneness with everything.
The Church itself was often suspicious of such mystics. After all, Christianity was based on the idea that ‘oneness’ with God could not come until death. In this way, Christianity demanded good Christian obedience in life so as to deserve heaven rather than hell.
Of course, it would have been inappropriate to take action against such obviously ‘good’ Christians, so they were given a special category by being blessed. But it is important to note, had such experiences been admitted by ‘normal’ people, the Inquisition and death would be the result, for they would have been possessed by the Devil.

© Anthony North, August 2007

Have you clicked Diary of a Writer on Blogroll? Meet me, up close and personal.
Click Tony On, on Blogroll, for my current affairs blog.
If you like fiction, click Fiction Page on Blogroll for my short stories.
Check out the pages. Find my Links on Eye On the World.

19 Responses to “CHRISTIAN MYSTICS”

  1. poseidonsmuse said

    Ah, the irony…You made an interesting point with this post Anthony. I guess, as long as you were cloistered in a monastery, it was acceptable to have such visions. When you consider secular society, Joan of Arc was not so fortunate…

  2. anthonynorth said

    Hi PM,
    Absolutely. The witchhunts were the worst. Whilst most weren’t witches at all, many who had visions found their way to the stake. As so, too, with Joan of Arc – although there was a bit of additional politics in that one.

  3. SouthernWaylander said

    What is written about all these people are true. I have experienced visions like this several times now, but I do not meditate as what those people did. I would probably encounter these visions more if I did. I started seeing them when I became a reborn Christian, and was baptised.

    Last night I saw something more spectacular than what I can describe, something that the bunch of unchallenged theories that we class as science would probably try and explain away as ‘abnormal brain activity’.

    I saw something happen in Nigeria in real time involving a group of armed robbers, and I was in England. A phone call from a friend’s wife in Nigeria confirmed the whole event, even though she did not know about what I saw. It normally pushes my emotional level through the roof, but it does strengthen my belief in God every single time.

    Well, not gonna leave my name here, seeing as Joan was the main attraction at the bonfire….

  4. anthonynorth said

    Hi SouthernWaylander,
    You may be interested in this post:

    PSYCHIC DETECTIVES

  5. WhoreChurch said

    Good post. I would add that language makes a significant difference in the Christian realm and how we accept things today. For example: We don’t have a problem with the word “prophet” yet “psychic” gives most Christians the heebie jeebies. (As you note in your psychic detective post.)

    I try to use neutral language rather than “Christian” language since at least half my readers are not Christian and a goodly number of them are somewhat hostile toward Christianity.

    If a Christian has not experienced anything providing proof of God’s existence, then Jesus is just their imaginary friend.

  6. L. Peterson said

    Unless I recollect Anglo-Franco history incorrectly, I believe everyone (well, the French anyway) was pretty keen on Joan and her visions as long as the victories kept coming. Seems the French had no problems rallying to her Marion standard specifically on account of her visions although perhaps Chuck 7 was quietly happy to be rid of a popular figure and potential threat to his reign. The English on the other hand just wanted to do in the enemy mascot and get revenge for wrecking the claim of Henry V on the French throne. Even the English doubted she was a heretic and had to doctor the evidence to justify the sentence.

    I suppose the lesson is, if you plan on being a mystic make sure you stay away from Burgundians…

  7. Don said

    “The Christian of the future will be a mystic or he will not exist at all.”–Karl Rahner.

    Thanks for your writing. Mysticism is not written about enough nor is it talked about in church circles enough. To be sure you’ve got some of the important historical mystics listed. I would include Anthony De Mello, Thomas Merton and Dorothy Day. 🙂 Don

  8. Typo said

    In the St. Benedict section it says “lived ass a hermit”.

  9. kyrie said

    In terms of non-clerical mystics or people with a mystical bent, I would include Blaise Pascal – read his “Memorial” testimony in the Pensees – William Blake too of course, and William Butler Yeats. Another person who had a mystical bent who was a devout Catholic and would take time to meditate in the mountains was the tall and handsome Colonel Count Claus von Stauffenberg (who unfortunately is being played by Tom Cruise in an “action film”!). Claus was the young man who tried to blow up Hitler in 1944. He was also a disciple of the German poet and mystic Stefan George. An anti-Nazi religious military guy and mystic – who would have thunk it?

  10. Hi Typo,
    I’m really glad you’ve got plenty to keep you occupied. I think I’ll leave it for posterity.
    Or is that posterior?

  11. anthonynorth said

    Thanks for these comments guys. Don, I like the Rahner quote. Does that mean we can see Christianity becoming more ‘personal’ as opposed to ‘communal’, I wonder?
    WhoreChurch, I think, like me, you walk a tightrope between varying beliefs and ideas. Good luck. ‘L’, I hope that doesn’t include a good Burgundy?

  12. red pill junkie said

    Strange not to mention St. Francis of Asisi and St. Anthonio di Padua, although they could be included in a future take on stigmatism.

    There was this monk, I don’t remember his name but I have a book where they mention him, that supposedly had such mystical trances that he could actually FLY. He would enter in such states of joy that in the middle of mass he would fly to the crucifix altar to make reverences. Numerous persosn were witnesses of his paranormal displays; it seemed it was actually kind of an embarrassment for his fellow monks, but afterwards they did make him a saint. Let me look it up and see if I can find the name.

    PS: What’s your take on a guy like Giorgio Bongiovanni?

  13. anthonynorth said

    Good morning Red,
    I think Bongiovanni fits better into an essay on planetary consciousness – believe me, I’ll be getting round to him. St Francis, and others, I’m working on for a post on Stigmata – it should appear in the next week or so.
    The ‘flying monk’ was St Joseph of Copertino – another character I’ll be placing in an eventual post on Levitation. Although he’s an interesting character.
    He seems to have been a very simple man and didn’t intellectualise. Hence, the phenomena surrounding him is quite unique, in that it seems to have been out of pure devotion and nothing more.
    There are some quite comical incidences to his ‘talent’, such as getting stuck up a tree, the monks racing for a ladder to get him down. He once levitated over the altar and burned himself on the candles.
    By the way, many thanks for recent comment elsewhere.

  14. red pill junkie said

    Aw don’t mention it 🙂

    Yes, I find that fascinating, people would find St joseph of Coperino as a “dull” man, but maybe that was the reason he could do the things he did.

    You know, maybe that’s what Jesus meant when He said we should be “lke children”.

  15. nanderson said

    Great post. I love to read about the mystics from all ages and areas. Don’t forget Sarmad, Shamz-i-Tabriz and Rumi, Paltu, Mira-bai, and the great Pythagoras. They come from all the different faiths and yet they always agree. Mystics are true love.

  16. anthonynorth said

    Hi Nanderson,
    You are right about mystics from all faiths agreeing. I guess they take from faith an inner spirituality, and when this descends to enlightenment, an ultimate truth is disclosed.
    At the level of deep spirituality there is only the One, all religions being simply different cultural ways to try to understand it.

  17. dovelove said

    @Red Pill

    I think what Jesus meant with the be “like children” thing is represented in the Fool card of the Tarot. Oddly, the Fool isn’t a fool at all, although this society would deem him so 🙂 The Fool archetype is the first in the series of the “Major Arcana” in the Tarot–representing our journey in this life.

    We all come into this world as the Fool, as a child. The Fool is the personification of faith, the opposite of the Devil archetype (personification of fear). The Fool goes forward all wide-eyed, without fear, with wonder and excitement, following his/her joy without the slightest inhibition (watch babies, heh)…the Fool simply doesn’t know fear, just like a baby. And in that innocence and natural “faith,” he creates “magic” in his life 🙂 Unfortunately, we teach the babies to fear, and to a point that’s a good thing. But this society and all our controlling systems have taught us to live and breathe fear…and consequently the “magic” that is inherent within us has been pushed so far down inside of us, that we scoff at the suggestion that we are powerful beings, and so we readily accept the enslavement that is put upon us…

    “Mystics” are different only in that they are potently connected to that magic (like the “Fool,” the child) that is within us all. A fearless heart is a most powerful one.

    Peace,
    Dove

  18. I think it would do Christianity much good to take mysticism out of the monastery – to demystify it and put contemplative prayer and meditation on a par with petitionary prayer for the laity. Personally, I’ve found contemplative prayer of greater value.

  19. anthonynorth said

    Hi Paul,
    This would be a good thing, but the problem is, I think, religion is more a social codification, whereas mysticism is an inner spirituality – personal as opposed to communal.
    I have a suspicion open mysticism would be frowned upon in western religions. A great shame, as I think you’re right.

Leave a comment